text menu at bottom of page

That is, this patriarch is as much victim as aggressor, simultaneously present and absent. Or as White draws it up in the prologue:

As the kids howl about him, Carl lays oblivious on the couch, a silent enigma doing his damage by doing nothing. Nothing but watch TV. "The defining childhood memory of my father," writes Chris, Curtis's fictional surrogate, "is of a man (but not just a man, of course; it is my father - young, handsome, capable!) reclined on a dingy couch watching TV." In this, Carl is reminiscent of the father in White's other family portrait, The Idea of Home, who drives a bread truck all day and has one emotion, exhaustion. For as White implies, Carl is what his culture has made him. And for this reason, our sympathies are ultimately with him.

Yet to discuss Carl (or any of the characters) as if he was a person is to miss the point. For as Harris notes, he is "less a character than an intertextual nexus." Indeed, to summarize the "story" of Memories is to sidestep what is for Harris its actual subject, what White calls "that which saturates consciousness without having to be meaningful." Not that this excuses Carl's neglect of his real-world or fictional children, characterized in the book as child abuse. Rather, it helps us understand Carl's watching and absorbing television's Geist to the point where he is a father made of gray pixels. An American tragedy: Father, i.e., 'First and Best Source of Wisdom' to his children, literally becomes to young Chris a "shadow memory," that phenomenon in which a person remembers having lived an experience that was in actuality only seen on television.

Initially, this takes the form of a transcript of Dotto, a crooked quiz show Carl participates in, and through his participation demonstrates to the nation how to take its first baby steps down the road of its own self-betrayal. After the introductions during which Carl is unable to explain his position at a cat food company, the host continues:

Like TV soldiers who later in the book are not allowed even "the most basic human acknowledgment," Carl sees how at the hands of his accomplice, television, he is not a man, not even human. Indeed, in an insightful overview of White's oeuvre, Robert L. McLaughlin identifies this as a concern throughout White's work: "the way people are conditioned to accept the social world - as it has been defined by the power elite's ideology of control - as the only possible reality, even though this reality fails to serve and works against the interests of the great majority of us." Naturally, the host just breezes by this moment: If Kosinski's novel Being There is sociology, then Memories is the politics of that sociology - making manifest who is served, and who pays. It is more edgy, more extreme in form and message: an education in how to read popular culture, echoed by post-McLuhan critics like George W.S. Trow (There's an appliance in every living room that makes people stupid); Mark Crispin Miller (Big Brother is us, constantly monitoring our behavior to conform to television); Neil Postman (Las Vegas as paradigm for American culture ); Daniel Bell (who argues that capitalist culture urges us to be Puritans at work and hedonists in our buying habits). And of course the Hegelian and postructuralist sources cited by the RCF and White in his essays. After the above exchange of condescension and self-loathing, Carl continues the game, beating a Columbia professor by defining correctly terms like "the distal cause in hopelessness depression," and identifying a connect-the-dots picture of a turd wearing a hat. When Carl acts out by telling the audience he won because he was coached backstage, the host, an apparent spokesman for the audience who is, of course, spokesman for only the sponsors, banishes him to the game-show's isolation booth for calling into question the goodness and intelligence of the common man. As in real life, the audience, The Market, must be made to feel good about itself in order to perpetuate the real game of buying and selling.

Which is NOT to ask, Why is it that the spell-checker of the word processor I'm using to write this review never knows words like "transgressive" or "postcolonial" but it always knows words like "Microsoft" and "Internet"? Throughout the novel we see a working out of the themes White addresses in his essays, especially representation, and how the dominant discourse continuously exerts its influence over what is said, how it is said, what is valorized and what is suppressed. Specifically, as White formulates it at our moment in literary history, this is a critique of how the conventions of realism have become "a part of the machinery of the political state." Conventions by which "the State explains to its citizens the relationship between themselves and Nature, economics, politics and their own sexuality." Reading Memories and Monstrous Possibilities against each other, it's easy to conflate game-show host, State, television, commerce and all the millions of large and small ways that, as White says by quoting Italo Calvino, seek "'to confirm and consecrate the established order of things.'" In the title essay to Monstrous Possibilities he continues, "This massive epistemological exercise takes place every day, right before our eyes on television, in the movies, in Time magazine, in the simpleminded, casual rhetoric of politicians, and so on." The totalizing reality of literary realism, or any all-embracing idiom, is, in fact, what White says postmodernism and its critical, theory-driven language opposes - the homogenization of literature, the homogenization of personality.

 

 

 

 

>--thREADs     reVIEWs--<