Introduction
by Cris Mazza
When the call-for-manuscripts for On the Edge: New Women's Fiction
Anthology went out in June 1994, I asked for postfeminist writers working with
alternative fiction. I just thought "postfeminist" was a funky word --
possibly a controversial one if read "anti feminist" -- so I didn't define it.
I probably couldn't have if I wanted to. It was almost a joke, an ice-breaker,
and I wanted to see what it would produce. I knew I was looking for something
different, something that stretched the boundaries of what has been considered
"women's writing," something that might be able to simply be called "writing"
without defining it by gender, and yet at the same time speak the diversity and
depth of what women writers can produce rather than what they're expected to
produce. The result is here within these pages. I found that articulating or
defining what is the different sort of fiction I was seeking to include was
best accomplished by looking afterwards at the pieces assembled between the
covers. And, naturally, it was actually the the 400 manuscripts answering the
call for "postfeminist writing" combined with with the perception of the
editors selecting the eventual contents of the book that produced an answer --
at least our answer -- to the question on the flier: "What is Postfeminist
fiction?"
Not anti-feminist at all, but also not: my body, myself
my lover left me and I am so sad
With titles like Scoo Boy, Skittles, Mustard, Sugar Smacks, and The Young Lady
Who Fell From a Star, I can tell these women are smiling (or sneering) as they
write. Their fiction is often irreverent toward the very issues women are
concerned with, their styles and forms are at times quirky, droll, jocular,
frisky, ironic, but still their fictions carry weight and power. And what do
they write about? People who make life decisions by playing board games, male
impotence therapy groups run by women counselors, an obese woman paying nickels
and quarters for attention from teenage girls, a deranged hair stylist and her
disloyal dog, a surreal landscape constantly producing the body of a woman's
mother, a TV drama happening in front of the neighbor's television screen. Yet
none of these are comedy, none written for laughs alone, the point not, in self
defense, to turn laughter at a women's concerns into laughter with a woman.
The debris of life can be funny, especially when, as writers, we're the ones in
control. But irreverence is not mere dismissal nor a designation of
insignificance. Maybe women are simply no longer afraid to honestly assess and
define themselves without having to live up to standards imposed by either a
persistent patriarchal world or the insistence that we achieve
self-empowerment.
I realized there is such a thing as postfeminist writing. It's writing that
says women are independent & confident, but not lacking in their share of
human weakness & not necessarily self-empowered; that they are dealing with
who they've made themselves into rather than blaming the rest of the world;
that women can use and abuse another human being as well as anyone; that women
can be conflicted about what they want and therefore get nothing; that women
can love until they hurt someone, turn their own hurt into love, refuse to
love, or even ignore the notion of love completely as they confront the other
90% of life. Postfeminist writing says we don't have to be superhuman anymore.
Just human.