CLF: THE COUNCIL FOR THE LITERATURE OF THE FANTASTIC
by Daniel Pearlman
(origially published in Dreams from the Strangers' Cafe #5)
The literary marketplace in the United States, and to a
considerable degree in Britain, tends to take seriously only products of
so-called
"realism," relegating to the organs of popular culture works that incorporate
the
"fantastic." Once so dismissed, even the profoundest of fantastic fictions has
little chance of ever coming to the attention of the mainstream reader--that
intelligent, discriminating soul who has been brainwashed for nearly a century
by
market forces that continue to impoverish American and British literature. It
is to
correct this imbalance that I, with the help of a good many friends in both our
countries--publishers, writers, and readers who feel cheated, as I do--am
developing
an organization called CLF, the Council for the Literature of the Fantastic.
CLF is just gearing up here at the University of Rhode Island, where I am a
tenured
full professor who teaches virtually all of the advanced creative-writing
courses
offered on campus. I would probably leave well enough alone if I were not
myself a
writer of LF, the "literary fantastic," who has been struggling for many years
against stifling mindsets that can afflict the editors of both "literary" as
well as
"commercial" or genre publications. And I am personally acquainted with some
fine
writers of non-realistic work who would be much better known today in "the
world at
large" if they did not have to suffer the kneejerk labeling of the marketplace.
The main goal of CLF is to break down this division in which literary
realism
sees itself as the sole stronghold of literary values, St. George fighting the
dragon of popular culture, trying to fend off anything that smacks of the
fantastic,
because LR (literary realism) falsely equates the fantastic with mere escapism.
CLF intends to accomplish this goal by providing major services to small-press
publishers, editors, writers, and readers and to anyone else who has a stake in
LF, the literature of the fantastic. By employing the resources of a
large
university--graduate and undergraduate students in various disciplines,
faculty,
computer services, office space--and by enlisting the contributions of
sympathetic
professionals both here in the U.S. and abroad, CLF will promote literary
presses
and writers and individual works that, in our best judgment, deserve wider
recognition than they are getting.
THE LITERATURE OF THE FANTASTIC
The "Fantastic" as such encompasses all kinds of writing containing
non-realistic
elements, from ancient Greek myths to modern commercial science fiction and
fantasy.
The "Literature of the Fantastic," which is to be the focus of our
organization,
concerns only work of mature literary value (in the non-realistic mode) and
therefore excludes purely escapist kinds of writing. It includes "literature"
in
the age-old tradition that encompasses Homer, Rabelais, Swift, Kafka, Borges,
Paul
Bowles and a thousand other "fantastic" writers, whether or not they also write
in
the mainstream realist tradition. Contemporary American writing in that ageless
tradition, a lineage whose American past includes Irving, Poe, Hawthorne, and
Melville, among others, has become increasingly marginalized over the course of
most
of a century during which realism has dominated the literary mainstream, and
most
Fantastic writing, the good lumped together with the bad, has been awarded
scant
critical attention and has been banished to the genre "ghettoes."
To restore
the balance, those voices of the Literary Fantastic-- whether garbed in
traditionalist or experimentalist modes--need to be given a cultural forum
which
keynotes their common independence from the strictures of Mainstream
Realism.
Noteworthy literary works in the above-defined "fantastic" mode, works
that fail
to receive adequate critical recognition whether they happen to appear in
mainstream
or genre publications, need to be properly assessed and brought to the
attention
of a larger public. It would be difficult to define here what I mean by a work
of
"literary" value, but suffice it to say that it must stand up to being judged
by
the light of all of world literature, by past accomplishments in the
domains of
both Realism and the Fantastic, and not lay claim to immunity from
judgment by
any criteria other than the limited, commercially assigned standards of its own
contemporary market-niche or genre.
THE MARGINALIZATION OF THE FANTASTIC
The Pynchons and Atwoods and Vonneguts, although notable mainstream exceptions,
do not
contradict the general rule that the mainstream marketplace practises, by and
large,
an almost unstated ideology of neglect and marginalization of the
fantastic.
Magic Realism, for example, is acceptable to the mainstream American publisher,
so
long as it is a translation of a Latin American--or East European, or
African--work, but our native literature of Magic Realism is so
neglected that a
small magazine called Magic Realism came into existence here very
recently to
attempt a corrective. In fact, the last several years have seen a significant
but
uncoordinated burgeoning of little magazines that serve to fill a deeply
felt gap
in the "fantastic" area. In addition to Magic Realism, a handful of such
recent
magazines springs immediately to mind: Black Ice, Blue Light Red Light,
Century,
Gaia, Gateways, Puck!, Nonstop, SF Eye, and The Silver Web, all of
them of
miniscule circulation. (This is by no means an exhaustive list, and I have
given
only some American examples.)
The niche-defying sorts of fantastic literature
that such publications tend either to include or foreground has begun to be
called
"slipstream," a coinage by Bruce Sterling that helps create a new
literary-market
space between mainstream and genre publication. "Speculative fiction," a
related
term, has been around for a long time, and often occurs as a sophisticated
designation--confusingly abbreviated as SF--for the fantasy and science-fiction
genres. In my view, however, LF, the Literature of the Fantastic, is a far more
inclusive designation than "slipstream," which it subsumes as a subcategory, or
"speculative," a word which suggests an intellectually focussed
literature.
DISSOLVING THE DICHOTOMIES
In summary, our American marketplace for fiction tends
to create false dichotomies, either/or situations that determine how a literary
work is to be positioned in public consciousness. It is possible, however, for
a
non-profit literary organization like CLF to buck the tide, and in so doing
become
a creative force in the unleashing of major literary energies that normally are
not
welcome either in the genre marketplace (which tends toward the formulaic), or
in
the mainstream (which tends to see the Fantastic, no matter how well written,
as the
province of the-- presumably subliterary--genres). At the postmodern edge of
the
literary mainstream, the Fantastic seems to have found a new home, but largely
in
association with linguistic and formalistic experimentalism, so that the
Fantastic
as such tends almost nowhere to be foregrounded in the American literary
consciousness. The media, of course, have a field-day with the Fantastic,
undermining its thematic possibilities at every turn while stressing only the
sensationalistic imagery in which it abounds.
THE CLF NEWSLETTER
A newsletter
will be our chief instrument for accomplishing our goals. It will be
distributed
in hardcopy to the degree that we receive State or university funding. The
hardcopy
edition, initially distributed gratis, will eventually survive only if
supported
by subscriptions. Meanwhile, it will be made available over the Internet.
The
newsletter will be "consciousness-raising" in that it will not only attempt to
define the state of the Fantastic in the American and British marketplaces, but
it
will provide specific services in doing so--such as (1) reviews of journals and
small presses that print LF--reviews that are both in-house and solicited from
professionals in the field; (2) in-depth interviews with LF publishers,
editors,
writers; (3) ideas for expanding the markets for LF publications; (4) detailed
market listings for writers in the field of LF; (5) suggestions for
developing
university courses in LF; (6) essays by distinguished LF pros; (7) a letters
section; and (8) other valuable material that will eventually be suggested by
our
readers.
CLF AS CLEARING-HOUSE
The organization itself, i.e., CLF, will
provide concrete communication and marketing services to journals, magazines,
and
small presses that, in our evolving collective judgment, publish at least
some
fine work in the area of LF (whether literary works or criticism), even,
perhaps, if
the publications' general emphasis were something other. To facilitate
communication, we expect to set up an Internet BBS.
DISTRIBUTION SERVICES
We would also, as part of our mission to be a central clearing-house for LF,
act as a
distribution center for American, Canadian, and UK publications (others,
too,
perhaps?) that we judge to have high literary standards and to incorporate LF.
Taking our cue from your own NSFA, we will support the survival efforts of
largely
marginal publishers by advertising and distributing copies of subscribers'
journals and books to anyone interested--even offering specially priced
packages of
several LF-related magazines or books for readers to try out during a year. (We
will
also encourage cooperation among LF publishers: e.g., their printing
free ads
for each other's wares--a practice already haphazardly in existence; their
displaying the wares of fellow CLFers at the bookstalls of the many conferences
devoted to fantastic literature; and their informing authors of other LF
editors who
might be interested in their work. In this regard I'm pleased to have just
learned
that San Francisco publisher Brian Clark of PUCK magazine/Permeable Press is
setting
up a small-press marketing service, with a Mosaic graphic interface, on World
Wide
Web as of January, 1995.)
ANNUAL "BEST OF LF" ANTHOLOGY
Looking ahead, CLF
could make itself an even more potent force in restoring the balance in
Anglo-American letters by the publication of an annual anthology
reprinting the
"best" in LF, a selection made, perhaps, after nominations of works are
solicited
from LF publishers and other newsletter readers.
If you are interested in
receiving news of CLF, including some form of the eventual newsletter, and if,
in
addition, you would like to contribute in some way to our efforts, please
e-mail me
at DPEARL@URIACC.URI.EDU or write me
at the Department of English, University of Rhode Island, Kingston RI
02881/USA.
Interzones